Biomass, seems to be the solution for our energy problems as it is showed in the article. Argentina has the technology needed as well as the human resources. It also has , good weather conditions, physical place and the water required. What we still need is the politic decision and investors to developt such an ideal alternative for the energy in the future.
I think that biomass is going to be a solution for many energy problems, but our most important problem is mankind. People doesn´t believes that energy will be end, so they don´t care of nature.
The biomass is going to be cheaper and more efficient. It is used in many development countries like Spain and Brazil. Argentine must start to replace gradually oil energy with biomass and give a best education about it.
The biomass is the cheaper to use but the worst in my opinion, we must find another way, because biomass produce pollution too... The factorys using oxigen to burn waste and produce electricity is a good solution, because u can dispose garvage and produce electricity too "The Crowd Farm" is the best, a way to produce energy just for stepping somewere is amaizing, i think this technology gona be the most used in the future
Nowadays i think biomass is the best solution for developed countries to decrease pollution because they have economical resources to maintain this and the needed education too. But in Argentina, we will probably use biomass in a far future, because we dont have resourses to develop the technologic that it needs, we dont have a culture or education and those things costs a lot of time and money that our country should expend in other things. Nevertheless we have some laws that rules some policies of pollution and provides some economical aids to people who do something to reduce it. Dont forget that Argentina produce arround 0,5% of pollution of the world whereas USA produce arround 30% of it. So the difference between us is enormous. Are we who should develop the necessary technology?. What i mean is that we cant develop something that IS NOT economic for us. Kyoto's protocol is an interesting document i'd like you read to get some extra information about polution in the world.
Burning household waste is not bat at all, but we should need a LOT OF WASTE to produce a bit of the necessary energy we use in our country.
Then, I think that making energy from human movement is the best choise, but it needs a huge improvement yet.
Biomass, seems to be the solution for our energy problems as it is showed in the article. Argentina has the technology needed as well as the human resources. It also has , good weather conditions, physical place and the water required. What we still need is the politic decision and investors to developt such an ideal alternative for the energy in the future.
ResponderEliminarI agree with you Juan Pablo.
EliminarI think that biomass is going to be a solution for many energy problems, but our most important problem is mankind. People doesn´t believes that energy will be end, so they don´t care of nature.
ResponderEliminarThat's true. Most of us neglect the environment one time or another
EliminarThe biomass is going to be cheaper and more efficient. It is used in many development countries like Spain and Brazil. Argentine must start to replace gradually oil energy with biomass and give a best education about it.
ResponderEliminarThe biomass is the cheaper to use but the worst in my opinion, we must find another way, because biomass produce pollution too...
ResponderEliminarThe factorys using oxigen to burn waste and produce electricity is a good solution, because u can dispose garvage and produce electricity too
"The Crowd Farm" is the best, a way to produce energy just for stepping somewere is amaizing, i think this technology gona be the most used in the future
Nowadays i think biomass is the best solution for developed countries to decrease pollution because they have economical resources to maintain this and the needed education too. But in Argentina, we will probably use biomass in a far future, because we dont have resourses to develop the technologic that it needs, we dont have a culture or education and those things costs a lot of time and money that our country should expend in other things. Nevertheless we have some laws that rules some policies of pollution and provides some economical aids to people who do something to reduce it.
ResponderEliminarDont forget that Argentina produce arround 0,5% of pollution of the world whereas USA produce arround 30% of it. So the difference between us is enormous. Are we who should develop the necessary technology?. What i mean is that we cant develop something that IS NOT economic for us. Kyoto's protocol is an interesting document i'd like you read to get some extra information about polution in the world.
Burning household waste is not bat at all, but we should need a LOT OF WASTE to produce a bit of the necessary energy we use in our country.
Then, I think that making energy from human movement is the best choise, but it needs a huge improvement yet.